السبت، 16 أبريل 2016

Week 7



Reflection
.


 

Using the Gibb’s reflective I will reflect on the seventh lab session we had for this semester. It took place on the 28th of February.  
 Description: I was given a scenario of a 32 male complaining of shortness of breath. Demonstrating a correct management and logical sequence of history taking was required from me. My management of this was correct however, I did tried to give the epinephrine IV since the patient have sever asthma and he used he’s puffs this morning however, he’s condition remind the same. Also, the general impression of this patient was anxious and he was speaking in words. However, my teacher remind me to give the epinephrine IM not an IV. Moreover, I didn’t follow the OSCE sheet in the order. But I was able to take the vital signs quickly. Also, I was able to take the history from the patient using OPQRTS and AMPLE .However, I delayed the treatment because I spent a while to take the history
.
Feelings: I felt more confident while assessing this patient. Moreover, I felt I am not aware about the route of epinephrine because I want to give it IV but my teacher told me to give it IM. Also, I felt I was very concerns about the patient condition. Furthermore, I felt guilty because I didn’t give the medication quickly which worse the patient condition
.
Evaluation: what I did well was evaluating the patient, I did the assessment quickly, I had my vital signs survey, RSA including the SpO2 and the temperature done quickly and had asked the PQRST and AMPLE. Also, I transported the patient to the hospital as soon as possible. However, what I know did badly was I delayed given the epinephrine. Also, I confused to give it IV or IM. In addition, I didn’t follow the OSCE sheet in order
.   
Analysis: I think my approach to this patient was not systematic because this patient was in severe asthma, I kept the patient question without providing the epinephrine quickly. However, I think my approach for this patient was correct as per the JRCALC, this patient took his two puffs of each the salbutamol and hydrocortisone with any improvement of his condition. This made me to give the patient the epinephrine. Moreover, it was a good case to evaluate my decision clinical making capacity
.
Conclusion: It is very important to conduct the treatment to the patient along with taking the history. Also, to make sure the route of the medication. Moreover, it is important to follow a systematic approach, the OSCE sheet and document all the acquired information to avoid forgetting when handover the patient  case
 
Action plan: Next time I will follow the OSCE sheet sequence. Also, I will keep practicing the approach of server asthmatic patient. Moreover, I will make sure that any patient who have severe asthma, have received the epinephrine, if the other medication didn’t work. Furthermore, I will make sure that the medication is administer in the right route.

Domain knowledge










Enquiry and Research



In this week, I felt that I am not fully aware about the injury that caused by the smoke inhalation. That why I planned to read useful article that may help to understand this concept. I read the “lung injury from smoke inhalation article written by
In my reading, I found that the Lung injury from smoke inhalation can be caused by chemical and thermal insults. As smoke is inhaled, most of the heat is dissipated by the upper airways by the time the inhaled material reaches the carina. Therefore, direct thermal injury primarily affects the supraglottic airways. Thermal injury of the intrathoracic airways occurs during prolonged exposure to high ambient temperatures or with inhalation of steam, since steam has a greater thermal capacity than dry air (Lee & Mellins, 2006).
Moreover, in terms of treatment, initially the treatment should focus on reversing carbon Monoxide poisoning, if present, by the administration of high concentrations of humidified oxygen. If severe carbon monoxide poisoning is suspected, it is helpful to administer oxygen via a non-rebreathing mask at flow rates higher than the victim’s minute ventilation in or der to achieve concentrations close to 100%. Moreover, with significant airway oedema, tracheal intubation may be necessary to maintain airway patency and adequate oxygenation and ventilation. (Lee & Mellins, 2006).
After reading this article, I was able to understand that Carbon monoxide is the predominant cause of death among fire victims and high concentrations of humidified oxygen should be focus on reversing carbon Monoxide poisoning, if present.


References:
Lee, A. & Mellins, R. (2006). Lung injury from smoke inhalation. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 7(2), 123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2006.03.003

ليست هناك تعليقات:

إرسال تعليق